Market share brl cad6/24/2023 This all provides friction that slows down market share changes. It takes quite a while to learn one, and once you have mastered a package, it’s really tough to switch. Only a little over 10% of respondents are interesting in changing their CAD packages. You can see that’s one reason they have such high market share–people try them and wind up buying. I’m not sure the numbers can be read that closely though–both have nice momentum on the journey from trial to purchase.Īdoption rates look good for all the top contenders on market share (and the list is sorted with higher market share at bottom of the graph). Solidworks has slightly edged out Fusion 360 vs last year where it was the reverse. MasterCAM looks good on this scale, but truthfully the sample size for them is pretty small. If the vendor is successfully getting their word out, then all other things being considered, the Adoption Rate should tell us who will grow by next year’s survey. These numbers are indicative of satisfaction achieved during a trial when evaluating the software. Draftsight does not have a literal 29% adoption rate if you try it, but MasterCAM’s adoption rate really is that much stronger than Draftsight’s. Treat the numbers as relative, not absolute. Here are the adoption results for the 15 Top Production Market Share CAD Packages: What about that adoption ratio? How many who tried wound up buying? The most commonly trialed CAD packages account for 82% of the trials:Īutodesk and Solidworks dominate the mind share, though the Google/Trimble SketchUp product is in their midst. The average respondent tries about 3.7 packages before settling on one, down slightly from 4 packages tried last year. A package that has been tried by many and adopted by few is obviously different than a package where the majority who try it adopt it. We can also learn from the ratio of production market share to “tried it” market share. If Market Share represents packages in production, packages tried is closer to being “Mind Share.” If you’ve tried a package, you’re aware of it so it has some mind share. The company just wasn’t growing nearly fast enough to take a run at going public any time soon. I keep an eye on OnShape, and while it gained a little share, it’s clear why they wound up selling the company to PTC. Rhino3D and BobCad are also gaining share in 2019, as is Vectric’s Aspire and venerable AutoCAD. The overall market has consolidated a bit for this group, but the two market leaders, Fusion 360 and SolidWorks both lost some share. Gray is 2017, Orange is 2018 and Blue is 2019 data. Let’s start with the Top packages, which comprise 90% of the market (up from 82% last year):ĬAD Packages used in Production. Here’s what the overall share looks like without any attempt at segmentation. In all, 39 packages were represented as being used in production by our respondents. Overall: Market Share of Packages Used in Production But it was early 2020 and so really is more like 2019. BTW, I am calling it the “2020” survey because that’s when it was taken. We have CAD Survey data for 2013, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, and now 2019, so we’ll be able to see a little market trending here too. Thank you all very much for participating! There were not quite 300 responses to our question about production CAD packages. Without further ado, here is the first installment! If you’re part of our email newsletter (signup is below this blog post), you won’t miss one as I will announce each update. I will present the results in several installments in the form of updates to this article. It’s time to present the results of the CNCCookbook 2020 CAD Survey! That sort of thing will not be tolerated, and I have removed all references to that product. Congratulations to our Gold and Silver Customer Satisfaction Award winners! Also, analysis of IP addresses revealed that one our contestants was stuffing the ballot box. Additional data begins below the first installment with share of free, educational, and pirated users. Article Update: Adding the results from our second installment.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |